As part of your application for Clinical Oncology ST3, you will be required to complete a self-assessment along with submitting supporting evidence to justify your score.
On this page
Important:
Accuracy
Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained on this page.
The information presented is accurate at the time of publication.
In this self-assessment you will be awarded points based on the details you give regarding your achievements and qualifications. You will be required to select the most appropriate option from a list of statements within each of the 8 domains of achievements. All achievements should relate to the field of medicine (in its broadest sense, for example, not just hospital medicine).
The options, scores available and supplementary guidance will be provided further down.
The options you select must be at your own discretion. We have attempted to clarify the wording of options below, but under no circumstances can we advise you on which options to select.
Experiences and achievements will not always fit neatly under one option or another. You will need to use your professional judgement to ascertain which of the available options is the most appropriate to the best of your knowledge and belief. If more than one statement matches your achievements, you should select the highest-level option on the list.
You will be required to add text for each selection to demonstrate why you chose that option.
Scores not adjustable after submission
You cannot amend this section after should you make a mistake on your application form or gained an achievement after the submission of your application; for example, if you subsequently pass a section of the MRCP(UK), this cannot be added to your score.
Important:
Over-claiming
In instances of candidates blatantly or persistently trying to gain an unfair advantage by over-claiming scores for and/or exaggerating their achievements will be taken extremely seriously. This could lead to an application being deemed not appointable, or, in very serious cases, could be reported as a probity matter to the GMC; however, this is a very rare outcome and only in cases of overt cheating.
Completed achievements only
When you come to submit your application, all of the information within it must be accurate at the time of submission. Any qualifications not yet gained, courses not yet taken, presentations not yet given should not be included at this point.
An achievement gained even on the day after the closing date for applications cannot be counted.
The only exception is publications which have been completely accepted and are 'in press'.
However, whilst you cannot select a point-scoring option on the basis of incomplete achievements, you are welcome to mention it in the text box for that section. You will not however gain any additional points.
Multiple achievements in a single domain
If you have more than one achievement in an area which only allows you to choose an option for one, for example, qualifications or achievements, you should select the option corresponding to your highest scoring achievement. You can then use the space below to mention your other achievements in the area, however you will not be rewarded any further points.
Achievements in multiple domains
If you have an achievement which could potentially fit under more than one domain, for example winning a prize for a poster or doing a presentation based on a publication, it is acceptable to claim under both options.
The only exception is that under no circumstances can you claim in the presentation section for a presentation on a quality improvement project as this forms part of the scoring for the quality improvement section.
Time limit
There is no set number of years within which you need to have completed the achievements listed. Achievements claimed must have been gained after commencing your medical (or first undergraduate) degree, so achievements from school or before university cannot be claimed.
Word limitations
There will be a text box for each domain where you will be required to add text to demonstrate why you chose that option. Each section will have a maximum word count, detailed in the table below, however, we advise that you keep your explanations as short as possible to justify the selection.
The Panel will have limited time to check application forms and the more succinct you can be about your achievement, the more straightforward it will be for them to review your folder.
Maximum word count by domain
| Scoring domain |
Word count |
|
Scoring domain
MRCP(UK)/Alternative
|
Word count
100
|
|
Scoring domain
Postgraduate qualifications
|
Word count
100
|
|
Scoring domain
Presentations/posters
|
Word count
350
|
|
Scoring domain
Publications
|
Word count
300
|
|
Scoring domain
Teaching experience
|
Word count
250
|
|
Scoring domain
Training in teaching
|
Word count
100
|
|
Scoring domain
Quality improvement
|
Word count
250
|
|
Scoring domain
Leadership and management
|
Word count
250
|
The Self-assessment Domains
Please find below further explanation for the domains in your self-assessment.
MRCP(Member of the Royal College of Physicians(UK))/Alternative
MRCP(UK)/Alternative Non-UK alternative training
If you are applying without the MRCP(UK), on the basis of having completed Irish Basic Specialty Training and the MRCPI, or you are eligible for the GMC specialist register in general internal medicine, you can only apply if you have completed training, including postgraduate examination, at time of application so should only select the top option.
College membership - If you hold membership or fellowship of one of the three UK colleges of physicians (Edinburgh, Glasgow and London), without having completed the MRCP(UK) diploma, this does not qualify for the examination criterion and you are not eligible on this basis or able to score points in this domain.
Examples of evidence
- MRCP(UK)/alternative UK college examination - This should ideally be your certificate confirming completion of the full MRCP(UK), or evidence of completing individual components of the examination, such as letter from the relevant college. If you do not have either of these, a screenshot from your My MRCP(UK) account (or alternative specialty if applicable) is acceptable, provided that it clearly shows what you have completed, and your name, so it is clear it is your account.
- Eligibility for the specialist register in GIM - You will also need to upload evidence to your application form; this could be via a screenshot of the GMC specialist register or a scan of the letter from the GMC.
- Irish Basic Specialty Training in medicine - This will usually be via the certificate awarded by the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland; a certificate demonstrating completion of the MRCPI is insufficient without the certificate confirming completion of BST.
Option
I have passed both MRCP(UK) Part 2 Written and Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills (PACES) or an acceptable alternative
Score
8
Option
I have passed MRCP(UK) PACES but not Part 2 Written.
Score
6
Option
I have passed MRCP(UK) Part 2 Written but not PACES.
Score
2
Option
I have not passed MRCP(UK) Part 2 Written or PACES.
Score
0
Postgraduate degrees and qualifications
Option
PhD or MD by research (can include non-medical related qualifications).
Score
4
Notes
You undertook research involving original work, usually of at least two to three years' duration, and ideally resulting in one or more peer-reviewed publication.
A majority of the time during the period should have been dedicated to research rather than clinical training.
To score yourself for an MD it should meet the UK definition of an MD: A supervised research degree for students already registered with the General Medical Council, is studied full time over 2 years or 4 years part time awarded a doctorate if your thesis is judged to represent on original contribution to knowledge in your chosen area.
Option
Masters level degree e.g. MSc, MA, MRes, etc. (can include non-medical qualifications). Typically lasts 8 months or longer, full-time equivalent.
Score
3
Notes
This must be a specific course that usually lasts for three university terms (or equivalent) and is eight months' or more duration (full time equivalent); it must not be claimed for upgrading a bachelor’s degree without further study as is offered in some universities.
You cannot claim this option for qualifications which are gained as part of a programme where a substantial amount of time was spent in clinical training, with significant overlap in capability attainment with Internal Medicine Stage 1.
Option
Other relevant postgraduate diploma or postgraduate certificate typically lasting between one and ten months (whole-time equivalent).
You cannot claim for the MRCP(UK), or parts thereof, in this section, or an alternative membership examination which is required for entry to the specialty (e.g. MRCPI) to which you are applying.
Qualifications unrelated to medicine cannot be claimed for in this option.
Score
1
Notes
This option is for relevant postgraduate courses / modules - for example, diploma of tropical medicine and hygiene etc.
If you have completed an additional specialty membership examination to the one required for entry to the specialty (normally MRCP(UK)), this can be claimed for in this section; for example, you have the MRCGP in addition to the MRCP(UK).
You can claim this option for an MD or masters degree (by teaching, usually including a dissertation), where a substantial amount of time was spent in clinical training and being taught; the dissertation is a smaller part of the programme, not usually involving new research.
It is not permissible to claim points for partially completed qualifications - eg 1 year of a three-year degree.
For a qualification to count, the eligibility criteria must specify that only graduate entrants can apply.
Option
None
Score
0
Presentations/posters
Invitations
Typically, you will be invited or selected to give a presentation or show your poster. In situations where you are solely presenting or showing your poster because you have paid a fee you may only select the “none/other” option.
What can be claimed in this section?
Whether it is a presentation or a poster, your achievement should include delivery of novel data; for example, research, a complex clinical case or a quality improvement project.
This section should not include presentations primarily aimed at teaching.
What is a medical meeting?
Typically, this will be an audience of doctors and/or other healthcare professionals attending away from their normal place of work for which attendees will be undertaking continuing professional development.
The exception to this is the option for a local meeting where the audience is predominantly internal to that workplace.
What is a presentation?
'Presentations' referred to here are oral presentations, with or without slides, attended synchronously by an audience of healthcare professionals.
These can be of anything related to medicine, typically a case or case series, research or another topic.
It would normally be expected to include a question and answer session. This does not include oral poster presentations, which are scored under separate options.
Posters
To claim for a poster, you should have had significant involvement in the underlying research and compilation of the poster (first or second author). You need not have personally presented the poster; however, there must have been a defined opportunity for discussion during the conference/meeting at which it is displayed.
Examples of evidence
This could include a range of documents, examples include: a certificate or letter confirming the invitation and/or delivery of the presentation/poster, an abstract submitted to the organiser, inclusion in the abstracts book for the meeting, a copy of the presentation slides or poster.
Option
An oncology related oral presentation in which I was a first or second author was given at a national or international medical meeting.
Score
8
Notes
International/national meetings should involve a document listing the abstracts of the presentations and posters included at that meeting. National meetings must be open to anyone in the country and international meetings must be open to anyone from a range of countries.
For the purposes of scoring in this section, the home UK nations will be treated as separate nations. For example, a presentation at a Scotland-wide medical meeting will be considered as a national presentation.
Option
A non-oncology related oral presentation in which I was a first or second author was given at a national or international medical meeting.
Score
6
Notes
See the options above for notes about what international/national entails.
Option
An oncology related poster in which I was a first or second author was shown at national or international medical meeting.
Score
6
Notes
See the options above for notes about what international/national entails.
Option
A non-oncology related poster in which I was a first or second author was shown at a national or international medical meeting.
Score
4
Notes
See the options above for notes about what international/national entails.
Option
An oncology related oral presentation in which I was a first or second author was given at a regional medical meeting.
Score
4
Notes
Regional means that participation is confined to, for example, a county, medical training region, health authority, or beyond a recognised cluster of hospitals; for example, in the UK a multi-site trust or health board would count as local rather than regional.
Option
A non-oncology related oral presentation in which I was a first or second author was given at a regional medical meeting.
Score
3
Notes
See the options above for notes about what regional entails.
Option
An oncology related oral presentation in which I was a first or second author was given at a local medical meeting.
Score
3
Notes
Local usually means participation is confined to a single local hospital, trust, health board or university.
Option
An oncology related poster in which I was a first or second author was shown at a regional or local medical meeting.
Score
3
Notes
See the options above for notes about what regional/local entails.
Option
A non-oncology related oral presentation in which I was a first or second author was given at a local medical meeting.
Score
2
Notes
See the options above for notes about what regional/local entails.
Option
A non-oncology related poster in which I was a first or second author was shown at a regional or local medical meeting.
Score
2
Notes
See the options above for notes about what regional/local entails.
Option
None
Score
0
Publications
Information
PubMed citations - Any item included under an option stating 'PubMed-cited' must be cited in PubMed, so as to demonstrate that it is both peer-reviewed and relevant to medicine.
Where possible, you should include this PubMed reference when giving details of publications and the application form will require you to leave the web link for your article. Cochrane reviews can be regarded as equivalent. The only exception to this is in the case of published medical books, which do not require PubMed citation.
Authorship – Any stated authorship must be recognised by PubMed within the author section of the citation system.
In press - Whilst achievements not yet gained cannot usually be claimed, an exception to this are any articles/publications which have been completely accepted, but are just waiting to be published - i.e. 'in press'.
Examples of evidence
- PubMed-cited articles must have a screenshot of the PubMed citation uploaded. Aside from this, evidence could include: a photocopy of the article/webpage where the article is found; excerpts from a medical book; confirmation that your article is ‘in press’ if not yet published.
The PubMed link should be included on the application form where it is available.
Glossary of publications section terms
- In press - this means that your piece has been fully accepted for publication; no further alterations are required; and it is just waiting to be published
- PubMed - virtually all published articles relevant to medicine will have a unique PubMed ID number (PMID) assigned to it. If a published article does not have a PMID, it is unlikely to be relevant here.
- Peer-reviewed - this means that your piece has been sent to one or more independent reviewers prior to acceptance for publication.
- Submitted article - this cannot gain any marks at the short-listing stage, because it is not known if it will be published. However, you may wish to mention it to support your application, and you may wish to discuss this at interview.
- First author - this means first on the list of authors.
- Joint-first author - this is a specific definition and will be specified in the publication.
- Corresponding author – this is a specific definition and will be specified in the publication.
- Co-author - this means that you are on the list of authors as recognised within the PubMed citation system, but are not first or joint-first author. Contributors recognised within the manuscript but not specified as an author within the PubMed citation system, cannot claim for this publication.
- 'Other' publication - anything that is not an original research article (or book/chapter) - eg editorials, reviews, abstracts, case reports, letters, etc. On-line discussion forums or posted articles do not count.
- Original research - this covers basic scientific research as well as systematic reviews/meta-analyses.
Option
I am first author, joint-first author or corresponding author, of one or more Pub Med-cited original research publications (or in press) related to oncology.
Score
10
Option
I am first author, joint-first author or corresponding author, of one or more PubMed-cited original research publication (or in press).
Score
8
Option
I am co-author of one or more PubMed-cited original research publication (or in press).
Score
6
Option
I am first author, joint-first author, or co-author of one PubMed-cited other publication (or in press) such as an editorial, review, case report, letter, etc, related to oncology.
Score
6
Option
I am first author, joint-first author, corresponding author or co-author of more than one PubMed-cited other publication (or in press) such as editorials, reviews, case reports, letters, etc.
Score
5
Option
I have written one or more chapters of a book related to medicine in its broadest sense (this does not include self-published books).
Score
5
Notes
This refers to medicine in its broadest sense and not just hospital medicine. Books must be published by an independent publishing house, i.e. not self-published.
Option
I am first author, joint-first author, or co-author of one PubMed-cited other publication (or in press) such as an editorial, review, case report, letter, etc.
Score
3
Option
I have published one or more abstracts, non peer-reviewed articles or published articles that are not PubMed-cited.
Score
1
Option
None
Score
0
Teaching experience/training in teaching
Timescale of programmes
It is difficult to be prescriptive about timescales as it will depend on the regularity and length of sessions. What is important is that a lasting commitment to a meaningful teaching programme can be demonstrated. Therefore, you will need to use your professional judgement if your programme was less than three months on whether you can reasonably select this option and provide evidence accordingly.
Glossary of teaching section terms
Local - this means the programme is confined to a local hospital, trust or university setting.
Designing and organising - this means you have identified a gap in the teaching provided and have worked with local tutors to design and organise a teaching programme, arrange teachers and contributed regularly to the teaching for the defined period.
Substantial training in teaching - this means you have undergone formal training, lasting more than 2 days (whole time equivalent). Substantial training is defined here as more than the usual short (one or two day) course which is mandatory for most trainee doctors, and more than the usual online modules completed in a few hours. This does not necessarily need to be a single course but where multiple courses have been attended, these must be complementary and not covering similar topics.
Evidence of attendance and reflection on learning should be available.
Feedback - this means you have either evidence of senior observation and feedback (for example, Developing the Clinical Teacher form) or that there has been collection and analysis of participants' feedback forms with independent verification. Independent feedback should ideally be supported by a letter or certificate from a course organiser/deputy, local tutors or a report detailing the analysis. It is also important that you have reflected upon feedback received and can comment on this on your application form and at interview if questioned.
Teaching experience - option
I have worked with local tutors to design and organise a teaching programme (a series of sessions) to enhance locally organised teaching for healthcare professionals or medical students. I have contributed regularly to teaching over a period of approximately three months or longer.
Score
7
Notes
You have identified a gap in teaching provided and have worked with local tutors to design and organise a teaching program, and arrange teachers. You have a certificate or letter of recognition of your contribution. You have evidence of this, which could include formal feedback, the programme outline or reflection logs.
Teaching experience - option
I have organised a local teaching programme for healthcare professionals or medical students consisting of more than one session and contributed regularly to teaching over a period of approximately 3 months or longer.
Score
6
Notes
You have worked with local tutors to organise an existing programme and arrange teachers. You have a certificate or letter of recognition of your contribution. You have evidence of this, which could include formal feedback, the programme outline or reflection logs.
Teaching experience - option
I have provided regular teaching for healthcare professionals or medical students over a period of approximately3 three months or longer.
Score
4
Notes
For example, regular bedside or classroom teaching, acting as a mentor to a student or acting as a tutor in a virtual learning environment. You have a certificate or letter of recognition of your contribution. You have evidence of this, which could include formal feedback, the programme outline or reflection logs.
Teaching experience - option
I have taught medical students or other healthcare professionals occasionally.
Score
2
Notes
You have provided teaching on an ad hoc basis. You have evidence of this, which could include formal feedback, the programme outline or reflection logs.
Teaching experience - option
None
Score
0
Training in teaching - option
I have been awarded a 3 year masters level teaching qualification.
Score
6
Notes
This could be full time or part-time over multiple years.
For a qualification to count, it must be a university accredited programme, the eligibility criteria must specify that only graduate entrants can apply, and be worth an equivalent of at least 60 credit points or equivalent; the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education and the EC European Education Area have guidance about credit points.
Training in teaching - option
I have a higher qualification in teaching, for example, PG Cert or PG Diploma.
Score
5
Notes
For a qualification to count, it must be a university accredited programme, the eligibility criteria must specify that only graduate entrants can apply, and be worth an equivalent of at least 60 credit points or equivalent; the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education and the EC European Education Area have guidance about credit points.
Training in teaching - option
I have had substantial training in teaching methods lasting more than 2 days.
Score
2
Notes
This should be additional to any training received as part of your primary medical qualification.
Training in teaching - option
I have had brief training in teaching methods lasting no more than 2 days.
Score
1
Notes
This should be additional to any training received as part of your primary medical qualification.
Training in teaching - option
None
Score
0
Quality improvement (QI)
QI project (QIP)
The QI project (QIP) may be a new project or might involve the further development and sustainability of an existing change project. Clinical audits can be a type of QI project, if they use QI methodology. Your project must demonstrate use of recognised QI methodology, for example, Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycles or equivalent.
Please note:
If you have been involved in a long-running multi-cycle project, you can only claim points based on the cycles in which you were directly involved.
If your project has not yet completed a single cycle, you can only select the 'none/other' option.
Coronavirus (COVID-19) – it is recognised that some quality improvement projects may have been disrupted due to the coronavirus outbreak. Any project which had been fully designed and data collection commenced but could not be completed due to the coronavirus outbreak, may claim the option as if that cycle of the planned project had been delivered. You must provide correspondence from your supervisor/or other appropriate consultant to confirm the situation and you must also have evidence of your work up to the point of cancellation; for example, project outline, data capture.
Examples of evidence - The preference is a QIPAT form. If this is not available, a headed document from your supervisor/organisation confirming similar information, which must as a minimum cover:
QIP topic (The reason for the choice of QIP is clear, aims of the QIP are stated, SMART and trainee led)
QI measures identified (Process, outcome and balancing measures identified)
Demonstration of use of QIP methodology
Change implementation (Documentation of progress, problems and unexpected observations. Run chart of results)
Evaluation of change (Complete analysis of data. Data compared to predictions. Clear identification of what was learnt)
Future application of the QIP considered
A fully completed QIPAT form or equivalent document will mean no additional evidence is required. If you feel you need to attach additional information to demonstrate your project, this could include: project outline/plan, the project presentation/poster; all evidence should describe your direct involvement.
Option
Involvement in all aspects of 2 cycles of an original QI project related to oncology where you can demonstrate a leadership capacity by supervising other members of the team.
Score
8
Notes
In addition to the requirements for score option 4 (Involvement in all aspects of 2 cycles of a QI project), you should be able to demonstrate that you undertook a significant leadership role within the project. This should include designing the project, playing a leading role in the project delivery and supervision of other members of the team.
Option
Involvement in all aspects of 2 cycles of an original QI project where you can demonstrate a leadership capacity by supervising other members of the team.
Score
6
Notes
In addition to the requirements for score option 4 (Involvement in all aspects of 2 cycles of a QI project), you should be able to demonstrate that you undertook a significant leadership role within the project. This should include designing the project, playing a leading role in the project delivery and supervision of other members of the team.
Option
Involvement in all aspects of 2 cycles of an oncology related QI project.
Score
5
Notes
For example, you participated in all stages of a PDSA cycle (or similar), i.e. or were involved in planning, data collection, data analysis, and change, as well as a further cycle. Presentation of a project is not essential as not all QI work requires presentation. It is likely that this involved working as part of a team but you must evidence your own role within the QI activity for all stages.
Option
Involvement in all aspects of 2 cycles of a QI project.
Score
4
Notes
For example, you participated in all stages of a PDSA cycle (or similar), or were involved in planning, data collection, data analysis, and change, as well as a further cycle. Presentation of a project is not essential as not all QI work requires presentation. It is likely that this involved working as part of a team but you must evidence your own role within the QI activity for all stages.
Option
Participating in QI activity – this requires Involvement in 1 aspect of a completed, multicycle QI project or involvement in 2 or more aspects of a single cycle QI project.
Score
1
Notes
For example, you were only involved in data collection in a multi-cycle project, or you were involved in data collection and analysis in a single cycle project. You cannot choose this option if you were only involved in a single aspect of a single cycle project; for example you only collected data in a single cycle of a project.
Option
None/other
Score
0
Leadership
Option
I hold/have held a national leadership or managerial role related to the provision of healthcare for 6 or more months and can demonstrate a positive impact.
Score
8
Notes
Examples include: BMA national executive, postgraduate doctor representative of a specialist society or college or a nationally held leadership and management fellowship.
Option
I hold/have held a national leadership or managerial role in a non-medical voluntary capacity for 6 or more months and can demonstrate a positive impact.
Score
8
Notes
Examples include charity, scouting/guides, sports, creative arts at a national level.
Option
I hold/have held a regional leadership or managerial role related to the provision of healthcare for 6 or more months and can demonstrate a positive impact.
Score
6
Notes
Examples include a role covering more than one hospital or covering a postgraduate training region.
Option
I hold/have held a local leadership or managerial role related to the provision of healthcare for 6 or more months and can demonstrate a positive impact.
Score
4
Notes
Examples include a role within one hospital or medical school such as postgraduate doctors mess president or postgraduate doctor representative on a hospital committee.
Option
I hold/have held a local/regional leadership or managerial role in a non-medical voluntary capacity for 6 or more months and can demonstrate a positive impact.
Score
4
Notes
Examples include charity, scouting/guides, sports, creative arts at a local or regional level.
Option
None
Score
0
Submitting evidence
After the application closing date, you will be required to load supporting evidence to justify the self-assessment achievements claimed on the application form. You should finalise and plan to have your documents ready to upload soon after application submission and will be written to soon after the application closing date to confirm the method and upload window for submission of evidence. However, it is advised to prepare documents in advance so this process can be completed quickly.
Interviewers will need to verify your evidence in a short time so please keep the below in mind when organising the evidence, you will upload, as poorly organised/presented documents may mean achievements cannot be verified.
- Only evidence supporting each of the claimed achievements should be uploaded. There is no requirement to upload any additional documents or achievements if they are not directly related to the scoring domain where points are being claimed.
- Only sufficient evidence should be provided to justify the scores awarded. Only include enough evidence to demonstrate achievements which justify your selection. For example:
- If you have completed a national presentation, there is no requirement to include evidence for other presentations.
- If you have written a book, you do not need to upload the whole book, just sufficient pages so interviewers can verify your achievement.
- Evidence of training courses or areas noted in your commitment to specialty section should not be included unless they specifically relate to a scored option.
- You must ensure patient-identifiable data is redacted as this may result in the employing trust being notified for failing to do this.
- Any documentation not in English must be translated, otherwise credit may not be received for this.
- File types and naming – there are steps that should be taken to make it as straightforward as possible for reviewers to check your evidence:
- Clearly name files with the scoring domain name appearing first, followed by a description of the document; for example, Undergraduate – Degree classification evidence – certificate.
- Aim to use standardised file types which can be opened by any user regardless of the software they have available. Whilst it is being confirmed which document types will be accepted, you should aim to convert all files to PDF, JPEG or PNG format.
- Ensure each document is contained within a single file, for example, do not take a photo of each page of a publication and load them as separate files.
Please review the below for examples of supportive evidence that could be used to support your score in preparation for this.
Evidence should include your name, date, and other details as relevant such as name of qualification, name of awarding body, grade, title of presentation or paper, place where presented.
| Category |
Evidence |
|
Category
MRCP(UK)/Alternative
|
Evidence
Certificate
|
|
Category
Postgraduate
|
Evidence
Certificate
|
|
Category
Presentation
|
Evidence
Programme - preferably Abstract book Reference (published abstract) Copy of presentation giving place, and date
|
|
Category
Publication
|
Evidence
Paper Pubmed citation link PubMed IDentifier (PMID) number Relevant book pages Copy of written abstract with details of where published
|
|
Category
Teaching
|
Evidence
Copy of teaching programme Copy of reflection Examples of written feedback Workplace-based assessment (WpBA) Supervisor’s letter confirming contribution
|
|
Category
Training in teaching
|
Evidence
Certificate
|
|
Category
Quality improvement
|
Evidence
Programme where presented Summary of results Reflection Feedback if available WpBA Certificate of course attended or qualification Supervisor’s letter confirming contribution
|
|
Category
Leadership
|
Evidence
Membership certificate Certificate of achievement Proof of leadership role (for example, letter, email, prize, photograph)
|
Page last reviewed: 13 November 2024
Next review due: 13 November 2026
